For what it's worth answering a bit late. I am not sure I completely agree.
2017-06-23 10:18 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com
<mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>>:
I agree with you, either use
addr:place
or use
addr:street
As the reason for using addr:place is that there isn't a street to
which the address refers, I also don't see which street should go
into addr:street, it makes no sense.
Have a look at this place "Siesel":
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.22209/7.90369. The hamlet is
called Siesel and officially all the streets there do not have a name
(you can check on the "NRW-Atlas: ALKIS" layer that all streets are
just designated "Weg" i. e. "Street"). From an official address point of
view all houses there should have addr:place=Siesel and
addr:housenumber=nn. On the ground, tough, they have put up the usual
German street name signs all showing "Siesel". So from an on the ground
point of view all houses there should have addr:street=Siesel and
addr:housenumber=nn. What to do now? I would say that in this case we
could perfectly well have both addr:place and addr:street.
I agree this is borderline but I don't see why we should categorically
refuse to have both tags.
Note that I just searched my mind for a case where this could happen.
The actual tagging here is just using the addr:street.
Tobi
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
