2017-07-04 18:15 GMT+02:00 marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com>: > Le 04. 07. 17 à 17:14, François Lacombe a écrit : > > I still have some comments : > > * fire_hydrant:couplings:type may only be fire_hydrant:couplings without > > the :type suffix > > * fire_hydrant:type really should be fire_hydrant only. I don't get the > > benefit of adding :type here (feel free to give me hints) > With fire_hydrant:couplings, you have to guess what this means.
Without reading the wiki, somebody can tag fire_hydrant:couplings=yes or > fire_hydrant:couplings=2 for exemple. > Sata will be of lower quality > Hi Marc, I got your point I'd say it's a matter of tags, presets, QA, guidance, not only of this particular proposal Even if contributors will know it's about the type of coupling, they will defintely have to look at wiki to know which value is recommended. Define precise presets in editors is a good start. Such problems don't appear with substation=*, pipeline=*, waterway=*... > if you want to avoid a generic subname :type, I think that should be > fire_hydrant:couplings_type > the same with for fire_hydrant:couplings_size > Why not for fire_hydrant:coupling_type The main goal is to avoid supplementary namespaces All the best François
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
