Hi, On 06/19/2017 05:31 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> If you can't point to a sign on the ground, don't map topoynms. > > -1, our criterion for mapping something is that it can be verified, signs are > only a part of it.
*Ideally* verified on the ground, but yes, other means of verifiability can be acceptable. However, the OP in this case explicitly said that "The extent of a settlement is not explicitly defined" which certainly thwarts *any* kind of verification, doesn't it? Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
