The university's & school's buildings are tagged this way. More detailed
than 'yes', but if you've the knowledge, the more detailed the better.
On 22/04/2017 22:46, Jo wrote:
I would tag the building as what it is: house, hut, commercial,
appartments or simply yes. Some of the buildings on the premises might
be garages or sheds.
Jo
2017-04-22 23:33 GMT+02:00 Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com
<mailto:davefoxfa...@btinternet.com>>:
Hi
It's been pointed out to me the wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpub
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpub> states "Set
a node or draw as an area along the building outline." This seems
a bit restrictive & outdated, given the high zoom levels. Many
pubs, especially those out of the cities, can be fairly large areas.
Where appropriate I've been mapping them as 'full areas' by which
I mean a polygon which encompasses the boundary of the property to
include all parts such as garden, play area, car park etc.
On that polygon should be amenity=pub & all the other relevant
tags. Any buildings should be building=pub.
This ties in with the tagging format for other areas such as
hospitals, schools & universities etc.
Any specific reason why the wiki shouldn't be updated to include
this? I note those doing the 'standard map' carto are reluctant to
render them, but I see that as their problem & definitely not a
reason to map as suggested.
DaveF.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
