I would tag the building as what it is: house, hut, commercial, appartments or simply yes. Some of the buildings on the premises might be garages or sheds.
Jo 2017-04-22 23:33 GMT+02:00 Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com>: > Hi > > It's been pointed out to me the wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ > wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpub states "Set a node or draw as an area along the > building outline." This seems a bit restrictive & outdated, given the high > zoom levels. Many pubs, especially those out of the cities, can be fairly > large areas. > > Where appropriate I've been mapping them as 'full areas' by which I mean a > polygon which encompasses the boundary of the property to include all parts > such as garden, play area, car park etc. > > On that polygon should be amenity=pub & all the other relevant tags. Any > buildings should be building=pub. > > This ties in with the tagging format for other areas such as hospitals, > schools & universities etc. > > Any specific reason why the wiki shouldn't be updated to include this? I > note those doing the 'standard map' carto are reluctant to render them, but > I see that as their problem & definitely not a reason to map as suggested. > > DaveF. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging