On 3/1/17 6:54 AM, Volker Schmidt wrote: > The original example > https://www.google.com/maps/@40.8190845,-76.8530417,857m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=en-US > <https://www.google.com/maps/@40.8190845,-76.8530417,857m/data=%213m1%211e3?hl=en-US> > is now a set of ways that can be used as non-freeway highways. I would > most likely tag them as either service or track with surface and > tracktype tags. Important to check on the ground the access rights and > add exact width, surface and smoothness tags. > In addition I would tag them in addition with > abandoned:highway=motorway if they were ever used as freeways (which > seem not to be the case). I would not use the construction tag as this > would mean that this is part of a freeway under construction. the disused namespace makes a lot of sense for this kind of in between circumstance. there are a few things in the Albany NY area that fall in this category, like the stub ends of the Dunn Bridge which are there, and have to be maintained because they're part of a heavily used bridge, but are supposed to connect to a highway that will never be constructed.
https://osm.org/go/ZdrEu0QBY-- note that i just noticed the tagging was less than ideal, and tweaked it, so the rendering may reflect the older tagging for a little bit. richard -- rwe...@averillpark.net Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
