On 2016-07-19 22:38, Tod Fitch wrote: > A map for hiking is greatly enhanced by letting its users know, in advance of > arriving at the trail head, that there are permits required. Even better if > those permits can’t be self-issued at the trail head. The only way to let the > end user know about this is to map it and to map it some sort of tagging must > be used. Current accepted tagging is insufficient.
I absolutely think that the tag access=private intuitively sounds like you're not allowed to go there. But the description on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access states that it's "Only with permission of the owner on an individual basis" which is exactly how I would interpret "access=permit" as well. Given that description however, you are not given information about _how_ to get that permit, if possible. So something like a 'permit' key would be very useful here! Apparently there was some relation tag suggested in 2010: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Relation:permit There has obviously also been discussion on access=license (or licence) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/License From the top of my head I would use something pointing to a URL: * access:url=<url> * foot:url=<url> * foot:permit:url=<url> * permit=<url> * permit:url=<url> or maybe access:description (foot:description etc.) for a direct human-readable text. Tod: Is there any proposal like this out there. Is the above along the lines of how you're thinking we could extend the current tagging scheme? -- Mikael Nordfeldth https://blog.mmn-o.se/ XMPP/mail: m...@hethane.se OpenPGP Fingerprint: AE68 9813 0B7C FCE3 B2FA 727B C7CE 635B B52E 9B31
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
