On Jul 10, 2016 11:28 PM, "Jo" <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Hans, > > The semantics depend on public_transport:version. > > If 1 then yes. > If 2 there should be no forward/backward roles anymore. > > Instead you add an ordered sequence of ways that is continuous. > > If you want a demo of how to map PT, we can do a hangout.
Yes that would be great. I'll let you know > > Also, have a look at this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Polyglot/diary/38980#comment35201 > > Mapping public transport should become a lot more convenient by the time that GSoC project finishes. > > Polyglot > > 2016-07-11 10:08 GMT+04:00 Hans De Kryger <hans.dekryge...@gmail.com>: >> >> If i remove the forward/backward tag on a section of a way (part of the bus route) does that signify the bus goes both ways? >> >> Regards, >> >> Hans >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
