Thanks Jo, Is there agreement on the forward/backward roles in PT2? By that i mean completely phasing them out. Or is it still an open discussion? I won't add them anymore if the point is to phase them out.
*Regards,* *Hans* On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Hans, > > The semantics depend on public_transport:version. > > If 1 then yes. > If 2 there should be no forward/backward roles anymore. > > Instead you add an ordered sequence of ways that is continuous. > > If you want a demo of how to map PT, we can do a hangout. > > Also, have a look at this: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Polyglot/diary/38980#comment35201 > > Mapping public transport should become a lot more convenient by the time > that GSoC project finishes. > > Polyglot > > 2016-07-11 10:08 GMT+04:00 Hans De Kryger <hans.dekryge...@gmail.com>: > >> If i remove the forward/backward tag on a section of a way (part of the >> bus route) does that signify the bus goes both ways? >> >> *Regards,* >> >> *Hans* >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
