W dniu 28.01.2016 10:45, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
2016-01-27 16:45 GMT+01:00 Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl>:
* shop types (as already mentioned on proposition page)
* amenity types (like fast_food + pub)
* long inscriptions on monuments/memorials (above 255 chars)
those all don't seem valid examples, a pub serving fast food is still
a pub, a shop fitting into several shop types is likely none of these
And probably a fast food serving beer is still a fast food. But you have
to choose what is "main" feature before making such statement and it's
not always clear.
shop types (but a different one), and circumventing the maximum value
length shouldn't be done by distributing the value over several keys
(if we wanted people to write essays in the tag values we could remove
the 256 byte restriction).
This is a real life tagging problem I had once and you seem to not
propose any way to resolve it in a different way.
It has nothing to do with promoting long entries, it is just an issue to
be solved somehow.
--
"Завтра, завтра всё кончится!" [Ф. Достоевский]
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
