Wednesday 26 August 2015 21:04:47, Andrew Errington: > Curiously, the disadvantages of "disused=yes" seem rather contrived, > and not really likely, whereas the disadvantages of "disused:*=*" seem > quite genuine. Not to mention that "disused=yes" is simpler, and very > obvious to a human reader.
You're kidding, right? To me it's clear that disused:*=* is better for things that are no longer what they were, e.g. disused:shop=* If however you want to map a canal where the water is still present, I'm fine with waterway=canal, disused=yes since the feature is still a canal, even though it's no longer used. -- The field "from" of an email is about as reliable as the address written on the back of an envelope. That's why this message is OpenPGP signed.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
