On 16.08.2015 01:24, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > grass isn't a "use", landuse=grass is nonsense.(IMHO)
Why, the land is used to grow grass. Thus, landuse=grass. > landcover=x doesn't mean there is only x, it says the area appears as covered > with x That depends on observation time. E.g. much of Europe is covered by fog in Autumn. So this will be landcover=fog. It also depend on the observation point. When you see arial images, forests appear to be covered by trees. But when you are inside a forest, you see more herbaceous plants than trees. > and x might also imply other stuff that has to do with x, like microorganisms > living in the grass, or soil on which the grass grows, etc > "grass" might even imply grass like plants (this has still to be defined) So go on and define these implications in your proposal. Currently, no implications exist. -- Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/ Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging