If the grass is municipally maintained the I use landuse=grass (I'm on
the fence about using landcover). If I have the time or inclination I'll
separate it from residential with a multipolygon relation.
If it private then I mark it as landuse=residential & probably leave it
at that. If you ant to go into more detail you could use the
garden/private tags.
Dave F.
On 10/08/2015 11:29, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
Take a look at this charming corner of Normandy: http://binged.it/1ht3p7v
On the left, a dense urban location that is clearly
landuse=residential. On the right, what is most definitely
landuse=meadow. So what about the center ? We see residential
buildings among a predominantly grass cover. In other areas, I have
seen this mapped as landuse=meadow - but it is wrong because it is
actually used as a residential areal.
To me, it seems that mapping this area as a combination of
landuse=residential and landcover=grass would be most fitting. I have
thought about using the landuse=residential + natural=grass
combination instead, but those lawns do not strike me as natural.
What do you all think ? Is this a good illustration of the need for
landcover=* ?
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
