On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:14:40PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > Am 25.06.2015 um 14:33 schrieb Florian Lohoff <f...@zz.de>: > > > > > > From a legal perspective they are not something different ;) Motorway > > might be something special - But tertiary_link, primary_link, > > secondary_link are not special. > > > > In the dark ages of OSM somebody overloaded the highway type with > > attribution. > > you seem to point on links while accepting that primary, secondary and > tertiary are genuine "highway classes", but they are typically also > the same from a legal perspective. > > By now we have all become used to it, so it doesn't really matter. A > cycle street is an attribute, a living street or a pedestrian road is > a proper class? motorroad is an attribute, path, footway, cycleway and > bridleway are different classes (with overlaps)...
I'd need a residential_link and unclassified_link - Can i have them?
I dont this makes sense to continue to introduce more highway attribute
abuse.
*_link should be deprecated and replaced with better attribution
"link=ramp" "link=shortcut" or whatever.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
We need to self-defense - GnuPG/PGP enable your email today!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
