> On Jun 4, 2015, at 9:11 AM, Richard Welty <rwe...@averillpark.net> wrote: > > On 6/4/15 11:53 AM, AYTOUN RALPH wrote: >> The oneway=yes, oneway=no conundrum...... put yourself in the position where >> you are looking at a road ahead of you. It is only wide enough for one >> vehicle but has passing bays along it's length. It is not wide enough to be >> a conventional twoway road so can it be tagged twoway? That would give the >> impression that cars can progress along it in opposite directions at the >> same time....that would be incorrect. But neither direction has the right of >> way and it is up to driver discretion and politeness as to who will reverse >> back to the passing bay. So oneway=no but twoway is not necessary yes. > i've used > > lanes=1 > > and omitted oneway in these cases >
+1 to this. Simple, logical: It is a one lane road with the default two way traffic.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging