On 2015-05-21 11:33, Marc Gemis wrote : > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:13 AM, André Pirard > <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com <mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Info is routinely in two places, e.g. building and > associatedStreet, to cope with software or people that do not > support one of the places. > > > that depends, some people use associatedStreet only to associate a > building with a street. They do not repeat addr:postalcode, addr:city. > Some people repeat addr:street in both, but not everybody does that. > BTW, addr:city and addr:postalcode is also not repeated in areas where > the admin boundaries and postal code boundaries are complete (e.g. > Germany or Flanders). > > Don't expect other people to duplicate the info. Don't expect other > people to leave the data in both places. I don't expect anything such and this thread is about the housenumber. As I have said, I want to avoid people or software missing the number when looking at a building of which the number was put on a node. What they miss of data put in by other contributors is beyond my control. Cheers
André.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
