On 16 May 2015 at 17:17, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Am 16.05.2015 um 15:29 schrieb pmailkeey . <pmailk...@googlemail.com>: > > > > Forest=natural ? > > > > or forest=man_made ? [=plantation or somesuch term for a human-planted > forest]. > > or forest=plantation? man made forest sounds a bit presumptuous ;-) > > > how about > landcover=trees? > > If the trees are too far apart, they won't quite cover ! Makes me think - why do we have an icon for a tree that's not used in woods and forests ? Wouldn't it be good if it was used and density=*% determines the spacings of the tree symbols.... sparse: 5:1 (space:tree) moderate: 2:1 Dense 1:1 (abutting trees) Very dense 1:2 - i.e. the trees overlap! -- Mike. @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property & pets* T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
