maxheight and maxwidth are indeed not advisory, but they are both still only "legal" and have ":physical" subtags to indicate the actual width/height of the obstruction. We won't be needing that for maxspeed I think.
On 2015-05-13 09:56, Jo wrote: > 2015-05-11 13:08 GMT+02:00 pmailkeey . <pmailk...@googlemail.com>: > > On 11 May 2015 at 11:40, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:04 AM, James Mast <rickmastfa...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Well, in the US, I've just been tagging the 'ramp' speeds ( > https://goo.gl/maps/Bw8Is [1] ) as a normal 'maxspeed'. I know several other > users here in the US have been doing it the same way. > > Please don't, as this is confusing. Advisory speeds are not limits, > maxspeed=* is the limit, not the advisory. Maxspeed does not imply 'limit' by name. Perhaps we should have maxspeed:advisory=* and maxspeed:limit=* not by name, explicitely, but that's how we've been using it since the very beginning. It will be really hard to change that. We also have maxheight and maxwidth, I think it's obvious those are hard limits, not advisory. Jo _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging [2] Links: ------ [1] https://goo.gl/maps/Bw8Is [2] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
