On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 00:08:31 +0200 Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) How would you tag the segregated cycle-and-foot-way shown in > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Separated_cycle_and_foot_path.jpg > ? > > My answer: > highway=path; foot=designated; bicycle=designated; segregated=yes. > In addition you may want to specifcy which side is the the footway and > which side is the cycleway by lanes=2 and bicycle:lanes=yes|no and > foot:lanes=no|yes I would add also surface (and maybe smoothness) as this one seems to be quite bad. > 2) How would you tag the way shown in > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/Separated_cycle_and_foot_path.jpg, > if there where no blue traffic sign? > > Answer: As there would be no indication on what kind of traffic is > allowed I would tag it as highway=unclassified Depends on context. It may be higway=footway, highway=pedestrian, highway=service, there are situations where it would be highway=cycleway/bridleway, maybe even other highway types in countries where typical road is unpaved. > 3) How would you tag the segregated cycle-and-foot-way shown in > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2b/Separated_roadside_cycle_and_foot_path.jpg > > My answer: exactly as in case (1) for the cycle-and-foot-way and in > addition bicycle=use_sidepath on the street I agree with full tagging map and footways would be mapped separetely. As temporary fixme it may be highway=unclassified with cycleway=track. Also, I would add also surface (and maybe smoothness) as this one for footway/cycleway seems to be quite bad. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging