One more point...
Some of those opposing the proposal say they don't have time to follow
discussion on the tagging group.. they may also claim they don't have
time to read the dissuasion page .. so for that point of view the
reasons why things are done should be on the proposal page... Not saying
their view is right or wrong, it is their view. I am simply trying to
provide the information on the proposal page that best describes the
value and why it is needed, tagged this way and its' impact on other
things.
I'd think the actual page would be very simple .. like
bbq http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbbq
bench http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbench
though this raises some interesting things for the temperature tag ..
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Attributes
On 7/04/2015 9:09 PM, Kotya Karapetyan wrote:
I agree with fly that it would be good to actually change the proposal
page to make it closer resemble the tag description page. Currently it
mainly addresses the RFC process and questions. As the result, there
is no "good" page for which we could vote. All discussion could be
moved to the Talk subpage.
Cheers,
Kotya
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
