On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bryce > This is not the right example. All tags in your example are attributes > that belong to the camp_site, no need for extra nodes; you are fully > correct there. > > What I am talking about is multiple namespace tags in a single node: > tourism=camp_site > amenity=restaurant;shower;bar;swimming_pool > shop=convenience;supermarket > What if I know the camp site has a showers, a swimming pool and a dump station, but I don't know where on the site they are? Thus: *tourism=camp_site* *showers=yes* *swimming_pool=yes* *dump_station=yes* What happens if the opening hours of restaurant and bar are different? What > happens if I can pay with credit card for the campsite, but not for the > restaurant? No way to tag that. > Once you map to that level of detail, make individual nodes. *Mapping happens in layers: often starting with a fairly basic representation, then moving toward more detail.* Forcing people to insert fake geometry to represent amenities is a terrible solution. Forcing people to complicated mapping schemes has a good chance of reducing map contributions. But as I said nothing needs to be done here: people have already mapped thousands of camp sites using the amenity listing style above. It's not new.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
