Ref1: good point. Any recommendation for the tags to be used? Ref 2: isn't this covered by example 2.1? Aren't the permissive ones at the bottom of your mail covered by example 4.4?
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:36 PM Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote: > Two issues I think the proposal should address: > > 1) Use separate tagging for a place you can park a caravan or car > overnight (as per your example), > compared to a place you can pitch a tent without getting hassled. They > really are not the same thing. > > > 2) Tagging large areas. For example default rules exist in the USA on > land of the US Forest Service (USFS) land, or Bureau of Lumber and Mining > (BLM). Camping is generally allowed anywhere it's not specifically > prohibited. Yet within those areas are established informal campsites. > It's not clear if OSM should tag these large areas with a camping tag, or > simply > inform the prospective camper of who owns the land. > > Regulations change from time to time, so it's perhaps best to refer the > reader to the official source: the website of the owner, land agency, or > store. > > OSM here is acting a bit like old "hobo chalk marks", where transients > would leave coded symbols to each other about places they found food or > shelter. It exists outside the official realm. Readers of a map however > should be clear which camp sites are "permissive" (e.g. you might get away > with it) and which ones are "official" (a rule says it's OK to do). > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
