This is covered in tagging #5 On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:50 PM John Sturdy <jcg.stu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it would be good to mark these, with a suitable description; > prohibited, no, or closed perhaps? If it's still a landmark that > people will recognize as a campsite, it can be useful for navigation, > and it may help to implement the prohibition, in that people turning > up there will have some kind of indication that it is not to be used > for the purpose that, on the ground, it looks like it's meant for. > > __John > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jan van Bekkum <jan.vanbek...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > >> > >> What to do with places where one cannot camp? > > > > > > Sure > > > > camp_site=prohibited or camp_site=no [for an icon: a tent with a slash > > through it :-) ] > > > > or even > > > > camp_site=disused > > > > > > -- > > Dave Swarthout > > Homer, Alaska > > Chiang Mai, Thailand > > Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging