On 11 March 2015 at 18:14, Jean-Marc Liotier <j...@liotier.org> wrote:
> On 11/03/2015 18:04, althio wrote: > >> >> To Séverin, >> >> For your particular case with your students and considering your time >> frame I would say: >> IMO it is taggable, no need to avoid in OSM. Go ahead. >> My preference is either place=block or place=plot. Pick as you wish and >> set the trend. >> >> > Why not use both ? The two illustration below illustrate quite well how > the city_block is divided into plots: > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/be/City_block.PNG > http://i.imgur.com/jbIe1vB.png Indeed both can be used and they are quite clearly defined. It mainly depends on how much details Séverin and the students want to put in the mapping. I think blocks because they are easier to explain, recognise and map. If one wants to map plots/lots, fine! Of course you can also add buildings and walls/fences. > And it will be a great pedagogical opportunity to explain that not every > tag is rendered by the demo rendering openstreetmap.org but that it is > nevertheless useful to use it because other renderers or users in general > will be able to use it anyway. Agreed.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
