On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 06:48:33PM +0900, johnw wrote: > I think it should be k kept under attraction, because a large mappable maze > is certainly an interest of tourists - especially if it is part of a larger > complex. > > Then it would be > > tourism=attraction > attraction=maze > maze=hedge > > or attraction:maze=hedge instead of attraction=maze + maze=hedge (so a > generic maze would be attraction:maze=yes) I actually like this better. > > I don’t know which is better, but it certainly feels that any large maze - > new or historic - is a form of attraction, so it should go into that - > Especially if we are going to have a definition for special gardens in there > as well.
in addition to that I think any large enough maze should be mapped with highway=maze or highway=path, dead end markers and emergency exits. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
