> Am 08.02.2015 um 16:14 schrieb Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de>:
>
> No, it definitely wouldn't. The building:part key has a clear definition
> e.g. in the context of 3D rendering that does not fit for courtyards at
> all. All building:part elements need to represent filled-out volumes
> rather than empty volumes like a courtyard.
in architecture you'd definitely consider a courtyard part of a building, and
volumes are distinguished in fully closed, open at the top and closed on top
but open at the sides (at least in German building codes aka DIN), but if we
have clear definitions for OSM that volumes open on one or more sides aren't to
be considered building parts, I'll take that back.
cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
