Eric SIBERT <courr...@eric.sibert.fr> wrote: > I started modifying the wiki following our recent discussion. > > For cuisine=*, I added: > ... > For shop=convenience, I added (in Tags used in combination): > ...
+1 > And latter go on with culture=* for nonfood services? +1 Hi Martin Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > The flexibility is not a pro but a con, too flexbile ;-) Flexible enough (pro) or too flexible (con): YMMV ;) I view 'ethnicity' as not flexible enough and 'culture' as appropriate. At least 'culture' is my preferred proposal so far. Maybe someone can propose something better. I think culture=* is good enough to start using it and document it and get more feedback. > I don't like "culture" as it is way too generic IMHO, it can mean a lot of different stuff I quite agree but argued that "Within the context of shops and with the associated values related to nationalities and the like, the meaning of culture=* is rather unmistakable." Other proposals were far more generic (origin) or a little too specific (ethnic/ethnicity, nationality, subculture). I think culture=* is a nice middle ground and a good fit regarding the values that are expected to be used. > you can see from taginfo that none of the currently > used values do fit with the here intended meaning: > http://taginfo.osm.org/keys/culture culture=* is indeed not used yet in the here intended meaning. Because it is a brand new idea and because it is discussed here first, instead of use first and discuss after. > Instead they mostly fit into a proposal I made up 5 yrs ago but then abandoned: > http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Proposed_features/culture Already discussed in some details. 84 uses, only tagging errors where culture=X should be replaced by amenity=X or tourism=X. culture=* is available as a tagging option, the current use is irrelevant.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
