On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Dmitry Kiselev <dkise...@osm.me> wrote:
> Here they are http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/78y > > If you read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Features/addrN > you will find photographs > how such addresses looks like in real life. > > And it's not the case when you have two entrances with different > addresses, > whole building have two or more addresses, it doesn't depends on entrances. > I am not doubting you that these exist, what I'm trying to understand is why. The images on the proposal page server do document that they exist. But pulling out a list from OSM doesn't explain why they exist. They could as just as easily be missed tagged. Can you describe the root cause of why these structures ended up with two addresses? Conscription is one example. However addr:conscriptionnumber is already in use. What I'm trying to understand is why is addrN the solution. Should addr:conscriptionnumber tags be retagged to addrN? Being able to explain to future mappers when and why to use addrN is important. Clifford -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
