On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Dmitry Kiselev <dkise...@osm.me> wrote:
> Andrew, you don't answered a question how to compare addr points to poi > points, > and chose is there one address or two or more. > > Also there is no chance to map building with addresses with node > (without polygonal geometry, in case you can't draw outline accurate > enough). > This seems like a particularly strange edge case for the address scheme, but I'm curious if any of those valid addresses are consider the "primary?" And if that's the case, what's wrong with creating a node on the building for each additional valid address? People looking for an amenity could look up closest POIs after finding a secondary address. It's not a clean situation, but it does have a couple advantages: - Works with existing data consumers - Simple for users to tag. Granted, it does have the obvious drawback you mentioned. > This problem is already solved by bare address nodes. There's > > absolutely no need to introduce an additional ugly complex scheme just > > to avoid spatial lookups into the database. > > Please answer the questions before making such pathetic statements. > Guys, guys, there's got to be an civil way to discuss this. We can all fight when we're drunk at SOTM. *ducks!*
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
