> Am 16.01.2015 um 12:56 schrieb moltonel 3x Combo <molto...@gmail.com>:
>
> The building tag
> is now clearly documented as pertaining to the nature of things, but
> this hasn't always been the case
at least in the past 7 years (and back then there have been hardly any
buildings mapped) it has always been the building type to be expressed with the
tag (and 99% have been "yes"). Now "type" is not completely clear either, it
can refer to the usage class or to the construction system for instance, but in
OSM I've always seen it as usage type (eg hotel, church, ...), eventually
combining formal aspects if you do it in a detailed way.
cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
