On Fri, 19 Dec 2014, Никита wrote:
> > leisure=playground
> > playground:supervised=yes/no
> > playground:outdoor=yes/no
> > playground:indoor=yes/no
> kids_area=* is not about these 4 tags. kids_area=* is disjoint to
> leisure=playgrounds. Please read proposal.
>
> http://www.imenno.ru/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/HD_08.jpg-940x626.jpg -
> leisure=playground
> http://www.realkidfriendly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/161.jpg -
> kids_area=yes
> http://goidapark.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/12.jpg -
> leisure=playground
> http://alpindustria.ru/UserFiles/Image/News/Novosib_kidsplace/01.jpg
> - kids_area=yes
> http://planeta-sh.by/Image/Uploaded/0.jpg - kids_area=yes
> http://www.labirint-bookstore.ru/images/upl/tinymce/pages_6_1281101285.jpg -
> kids_area=yes in shop=books
> http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/6001/vincentventa.c/0_508b4_38a3aef3_XL -
> kids_area=yes inside leisure=stadium
>
> Do you have tags forplayground=pony? playground=pencils? playground=books?
> playground=table? pl
> ayground=horses? If not, there no reason to talk about it in kids_area
> proposal
>
> I will not use over 70 tags to simply map single kids_area=*.
Why not? I don't see why the given list would be complete even for outdoor
playgrounds:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground
...so mappers should use new values when needed rather than waiting them
to magically appear on the playground=* wiki page.
However, I think it was bad decision to have it tagged as
playground=swing/etc instead of playground:swing/etc=yes (similar to
recycling:*=yes tagging system). That would have allowed better inclusion
of multiple equipment to the same object (e.g. climbingframe+slide is
rather typical combo) and use of it for the whole playground object (area
or node) instead of placing each equipment to the physical position.
--
i.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
