Erik, this gets really messy here. Not mapping a playground as a playground
just because of the access? We don't map amenity=parking differently
just because of access=customers.
We have all the tools already without the need for a new tag, and
definitely these shopping centre playgrounds should not be tagged
as kindergarten, the latter is a more institutional amenity.
leisure=playground
playground:indoor=yes or playground:outdoor=yes
playground:supervised=yes or no (referring to staff supervision)
access=customers
Никита wrote on 2014-12-17 10:40:
> We cannot map equipment, this is insane to maintain
Yes we can, see playground=* as approved, e.g. playground=swing
tom
Erik Johansson wrote on 2014-12-17 14:57:
Then I like kids_area when you are mapping a private playground that
is closed off without direct public access, mainly because I wouldn't
map them as a leisure=playground.
About supervision vs. childcare, we have lots of free supervised
playgrounds here which do not offer child care, and and I have no
experience with staffed child care facilties at malls etc. But for me
amenity=kindergarten seems to be an good match to child_care you would
have in a mall.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Philip Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed Dec 17 2014 09:32:05 GMT+0000 (GMT), Никита wrote:
Probably we should define kids_area as:
leisure=playground
playground:indoor=yes
playground:supervised=yes - "supervised by parents, not by somebody else"
And access tags, such as access=customers.
Phil (trigpoint )
--
Sent from my Jolla
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
