Ah - I made a mistake! the civic_admin and civic_service was the values for the landuse. My mistake.
it would be: Building=civic + civic=[ youth center?], or whatever value he would want to create. the civic=* subtag I’m suggesting would fill out the missing types of civic buildings - the big list of them on the suggestion page - are you suggesting to abandon that idea and just toss everything on that civic=* list into the amenity tag? PS: the description of the pizza made me hungry - especially since the local pizza here is horrid and the only acceptable slices are at Costco. I had no idea there were so many kinds of pizza in Italy! ^__^ Javbw > On Dec 16, 2014, at 9:04 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > 2014-12-16 12:36 GMT+01:00 johnw <jo...@mac.com <mailto:jo...@mac.com>>: > Building=Civic + civic=civic_services if it offers something to them (a place > for activities, government funded things or services) > > or > > building=civic + civic=civic_admin if it is a place where they go for > paperwork, IDs or whatnot, or both admin and services together (admin takes > priority). > > > I wouldn't tag any service by using the building tag. "Building" is about > buildings, not services (which might be implied in some cases). Agree with > you about an new amenity, IMHO something like "counseling" or consulting > service would be the direction for the specific case of informagiovani, > together with subtags (for whom etc.) or maybe use office=employment_agency > and some subtags. > > cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
