2014-12-02 8:04 GMT+01:00 Lukas Sommer <sommer...@gmail.com>: > I agree with you if you say that “usage” sounds like a very general key > and not a railway specific key. So the railway guys have just been a little > faster than the power guys and “occupied” this key. >
although it would have been better also for a railway specific key to be more explicit and have a namespace prefixed. > I would accept this and search another key to avoid unnecessary conflicts. > I don’t insist in “power:usage”. It can also be something else, but I would > introduce a new key for this. > +1, we shouldn't copy "bad practise" from other special interest topics, but try to make it better now and in the future. cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
