2014-11-27 13:43 GMT+01:00 althio forum <althio.fo...@gmail.com>: > An ideal(?) scheme would apply to name=* so that: > [name+1]=* is equivalent to alt_name=* and > [name+2]=* is equivalent to alt_name_1/alt_name:1/alt_name1/[alt_name+1]=*. > > The same scheme should also apply to old_name=* because you can get > several values [old_name+N]=*. > And then, in particular for [old_name+N]=*, it would be nice to provide > something for dates. >
and don't we want that for int_name too? And for loc_name and nat_name? What about reg_name? for dates there are some values around like old_name:1933-1945 http://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=old_name%3A1933-1945 cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
