On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:59 PM, moltonel 3x Combo <molto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "alt_name" is already a way to encode 1 > additional value for the "name" key, so if you're describing a scheme > to add any number of additional values, apply this scheme to "name" > and not "alt_name". +1 An ideal(?) scheme would apply to name=* so that: [name+1]=* is equivalent to alt_name=* and [name+2]=* is equivalent to alt_name_1/alt_name:1/alt_name1/[alt_name+1]=*. The same scheme should also apply to old_name=* because you can get several values [old_name+N]=*. And then, in particular for [old_name+N]=*, it would be nice to provide something for dates. althio
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
