What about introducing a name space: water_source:potable=designated | mineral | heilwasser (I failed to find a good English-language analogue, could someone help please?) water_source:sparkling=yes | no | unknown water_source:nonpotable=compromised | designated
In principle, details regarding the kind of water source could be provided here as well, to free up the top level a bit and help data users: water_source:type = tap | fountain | well | spring Please comment. Cheers, Kotya On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com > wrote: > > 2014-11-13 6:50 GMT+01:00 Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com>: > >> Let's start with the cases: >> >> * Designated potable, as in from a city tap. >> * Designated non-potable, as in from a farm ditch, or purple pipe (USA). >> This would include designated irrigation water of most sorts. >> * Potable but with a known defect such as high mineral content. >> * Unspecified. This may cover most backcountry springs where no testing >> is done, but no promises are made. >> * Compromised. For example a muddy spring or clearly impacted water >> source usable only in dire emergencies. >> > > > > there are more types of water that might be interesting to people: > > - mineral water http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mineral_water > - sparkling attribute (if it is naturally effervescent) > - in Germany there is a subclass of mineral water (~"healing water" in > German "Heilwasser") which has positive physiologic effects. > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
