On 12/11/2014 8:34 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:06:15 +0100
From: Pieren<pier...@gmail.com>
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
<tagging@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 62, Issue 31
Message-ID:
<capt3zjr3gsqafyxewxvnuyc2n_7tr-git3jpuortmauf2a1...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Mateusz Konieczny<matkoni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>No, unknown should be tagged as unknown. Even better - not tagged.
+1 We don't tag what is unknown. Pierre
'We' know there is water there.That water can be used.
If you can only chose between potable and non-potable, then you should
chose non-potable. Filtering and treating non-potable water makes it
potable .. I do this when in remote areas for my safety, particularly if
I'm uncertain of the quality of the water. In some cases acess to water
can be a life saver - thus it should be mapped no matter what the quality.
=================
Note change in Subject title - my appoliges for my error there.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
