> in OSM we focus on ground truth and having a local (!) community taking care 
> of the data and keeping it in shape.

The expected iconography differs between countries, as they are shown on maps 
differently in the different countries. At least comparing Japan to America, 
what they expect to be displayed and how it is represented differs greatly. We 
have to be flexible enough to let the rendering of one country differ from one 
to the next, if if follows the societal conventions of their maps. 

If we can't designate a single signal icon for the complex intersections in 
japan, and offer named signals as well, we are choosing to make an inferior map 
for Japanese users because it doesn't conform to the groups opinion on what it 
should be outside Japan. 

So the sentiment about local users and whatnot is just puffery.

Junctions naming in Korea happens to align better but "ground truth" is that 
people in Japan call them signals, publish maps with signals, show signals on 
signs, ads, billboards, and online - everything revolves around the consistent 
display of signals if we are going to render them. we will eventually have to 
clean up the multitude of signals rendered by OSM, and this is one reason why. 

This is a local tagging-rendering issue in search of a solution supported by 
the group  - a single (horizontal?) signal icon is required to be displayed per 
junction with a signal, regardless of the number of actual signal nodes that 
are needed for a complex intersection, and it has to have an optional name 
rendered with it.

Google conformed to this a few years ago, when they stepped up their mapping by 
importing and now improving zenrin's data. 
https://www.google.co.jp/maps/@36.4108183,139.3363032,17z?hl=en

Apple's initial map was crap, mostly because it was based on old OSM data using 
imports that were never cleaned up. 3 months later, AppleMaps got a significant 
overhaul (they also imported and are now improving a local dataset), and every 
month they get better, even for me out here in the sticks. They also initially 
didn't support the signal icon, and now fully support it.   PS - the Japanese 
post office icon is also used - another local custom we'll have to adapt to as 
well. Still waiting on the proper JR rail line rendering though. 



OSM will have to do it too.  What other way do you suggest that this be 
accomplished? Pushing it off is an option, but this is something that a 
rendered map from OSM will eventually be *required to display this in this 
particular fashion* in Japan. 

Javbw



On Sep 18, 2014, at 2:35 AM, fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> So far, highway=traffic_signal is only defined for nodes and there are
> only few ways and fewer relations.
> 
> Also in favour of separation I would prefer to use junction=* with
> name=* and only highway=traffic_signal with name if it is only a single
> light (e.g. the case with a named junction and different separate names
> for the lights)
> 
> This way we could add an additional junction=* to the nodes with named
> traffic_signal and once all lights are tagged separately only use
> junction=* for ways.
> Additionally we have a better hint for the renderer what to render and
> diversify between a named junction and single named traffic_signals.
> 
> cu fly
> 
> Am 17.09.2014 00:06, schrieb johnw:
>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like the end goal is:
>> 
>> - to have junction names in korea, regardless of if they are traffic
>> lights, and the symbol used there doesn't imply traffic lights, just a
>> junction.
>> 
>> - In Japan, the old junction system evolved to be named traffic signals,
>> and the symbol used there a  (horizontal) "signal" - so the end goal is
>> to have the name and the signal icon shown over the intersection with
>> it's name. 
>> 
>> 
>> so the "complex solution" is to map the the junction, (with different
>> tags for Japan and Korea)  with the area's way sharing nodes with the
>> traffic signals.
>> 
>> - in Japan's case, the complex solution must only render a single
>> traffic icon, or it will ruin the purpose of using the intersection icon.
>> 

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to