> Il giorno 18/set/2014, alle ore 09:30, Martin Vonwald <imagic....@gmail.com>
> ha scritto:
>
> Not good. Contrary to other people I think that the readability of tags is
> most important, otherwise we could simply use tags like ptn=pnx or
> road=flying_saucer and define that those tags mean "grass". Both could be
> processed perfectly fine but obviously doesn't make any sense at all.
>
> A while ago I wrote down some thoughts about a cleanup of
> landuse/natural/surface with the intention of clearly separating those tags
> and make it more easy to understand their meaning. I have to admit that I
> lost interest in this area so my writing just sits there and waits for
> someone to adopt it: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Imagic/landcover
> . The first section "When to use ..." would be the most important in your
> case. Therefore I would recommend landcover=grass in your case. If this area
> is also used to e.g. produce hay I would also use landuse=meadow.
+1 to everything, especially the "clearly separating" part
cheers,
MArtin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
