Hi! 2014-09-17 23:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl>:
> We (in Polish forum) think, that changing landuse=grass into natural=grass > would make better tagging scheme, since grass is seldom a "landuse" (like > the tree is natural=tree, not the amenity or something else). How do you > find this idea? > Not good. Contrary to other people I think that the readability of tags is most important, otherwise we could simply use tags like ptn=pnx or road=flying_saucer and define that those tags mean "grass". Both could be processed perfectly fine but obviously doesn't make any sense at all. A while ago I wrote down some thoughts about a cleanup of landuse/natural/surface with the intention of clearly separating those tags and make it more easy to understand their meaning. I have to admit that I lost interest in this area so my writing just sits there and waits for someone to adopt it: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Imagic/landcover . The first section "When to use ..." would be the most important in your case. Therefore I would recommend landcover=grass in your case. If this area is also used to e.g. produce hay I would also use landuse=meadow. Best regards, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
