On 2014-08-10 12:13, Никита wrote:
I.e they define this tag as subtype of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arch_bridge [5]. I don't see any real
application/use to bridge=humpback. Also, bridge=humpback does not
imply covered=yes by default. It does not define routing aspects or
adds any features to end users.
In the UK there are warning signs for some humpback bridges, and with
good reason - if you don't slow down substantially from the ambient
speed you will be launched into orbit. Therefore they should be useful
for routers, implying a lower speed on that part of the road.
https://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120222085933AAsnJiP
Some are so "humpy" that a vehicle with a long gap between the axles
and/or a low ground clearance (e.g. a low-loader) may actually be unable
to cross the bridge.
So I don't think it is right to say that bridge=humpback cannot be of
value for routing or end users...
--colin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
