On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 09:21:46AM -0400, Christopher Hoess wrote: > On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Richard Z. <ricoz....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > thanks, that looks much better now. > > > > Would it be fine to add the "simple_suspension" type > > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_suspension_bridge) > > to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:structure ? It appears > > that most of the illegal values were intended to map this type of > > structures. > > > Do you think "simple_suspension" or "hanging" is better as a type? If not, > I don't feel strongly about this, but it's a single word and not readily > confused with "conventional" suspension bridges.
not sure about this, more opinions? Yet another popular name is "rope bridge". Found one more culprit for the popularity of bridge=swing - a wiki page tag:bridge:swing exists. It is only a redirect seeing it from taginfo suggests it is a legal combination. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:bridge%3Dswing&redirect=no I would suggest to speedily delete this redirect? Meanwhile I am trying to clean up the localised pages. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
