On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > right now the nodes are not placed in the route relation. Although some > older relations might contain them.
Then you admit it is possible to keep the nodes in the route relation. Where now you have two relations instead of one just to avoid a tag "network:name". Don't tell me again it's to avoid a repetition of tags, we do this for many features in OSM. It's not for simplicity : the whole structure is more complicate to understand (more relations and different levels). Again, the real reason is to avoid a query in the database. > I think you will not find a lot of people in favor of changing the tagging > scheme for those networks, just because you don't like the network relation. > Anyway, if you want to change it, I propose you write a proposal with all > the required changes, and post them to the Belgian, Dutch and German mailing > lists and forums. I think this single list and the wiki, instead of ten local lists and forums, is more appropriate, no ? I don't have preconception about such relation, if someone find a valid argument/example which explains it's not using relations as categories. Pieren _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
