The same is true for cycling and equestrian networks with numbered nodes.
There are a few of those networks in Germany as well.

These are not collections/categories. They are networks of route relations.

Jo


2014-07-16 5:23 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>:

> In Belgium and The Netherlands a network-relation is used to group
> together all nodes and routes of a walking network. This avoids that we
> have to repeat the name, operator, etc. on each route (signposted path
> between 2 nodes) and the nodes.
>
> m.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I discover that OSM contains 1575 relations of "type=network"
>> (taginfo). I guess its definition is coming from this wiki proposal:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Network
>>
>> Quotes:
>> "A network groups together routes that share common characteristics,
>> e.g. a common operator, a common classification scheme (e.g. E-road
>> network: "E 1", ..., "E 999"), ... "
>>
>> "Use cases
>>
>> Person A sees a bus route with number 217 and wonders how many other
>> bus routes exist in that city.
>>
>> Renderer M wants to render all German motorways using white font on
>> blue sign (official layout), and all E-roads with white font on green
>> sign. This can be implemented by adding rules for  20614 (view, XML,
>> Potlatch2, iD, JOSM, history, analyze, manage, gpx) and  20645 (view,
>> XML, Potlatch2, iD, JOSM, history, analyze, manage, gpx).
>>
>> Renderer M wants to render all cycle routes that belong to the
>> "D-Netz". However, there are a lot of other national cycle routes as
>> well. "
>>
>> Plus some attached relations examples very explicite.
>>
>> As raised in the "discussion" page, is that not exactly breaking the
>> "relations are not categories" ([1]) principle ? Can we delete such
>> relations when we meet them ?
>>
>> Pieren
>>
>> [1]
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to