On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 00:27:03 +0200,
Friedrich Volkmann wrote:

> My proposal
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Drock_cleanup
> has been in RFC state for a year, and the only comment from other 
> users was a personal message concerning the licence of my photos. 

When a proposal just sits in a wiki and doesn't get spread actively by
it's author on OSM channels (forums, mailing lists) it doesn't get much
attention. Even /when/ it is spread a lot of people (I included)
often prefer to let it be.

> So it seems that there are no objections, and that we should
> proceed to voting. However, I feel uncomfortable about the cleanup
> chapter, because it's about nebulous subsequent edits on an unknown
> amount of data. Therefore I would like to make some cleanups
> beforehand, and then see what is left.
> [copied some cited stuff from the end of the msg here]
> There are 1216 objects to change.
> 
> Is this subject to the mechanical edit policy? If so, where should it
> be discussed? What user account shall be used? Are there any reasons
> not to do it at all?

The whole proposal is imho one of a mechanical edit.
How to do one is documented here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy

> I would like to start with data from the French Corine Land Cover
> import, because *all* the natural=rock generated by that import
> actually mean natural=bare_rock. 

For changing a french import you should discuss this with the french
community.

OT remark: As all Corine data I saw so far it is quite imprecise. Of
course the ways cover mostly the landuse they are described to cover,
but (e.g. as for woods) they often cover meadows and farmlands, too.
This kind if imports are good to get a country full of landuse but not
precise data. And enhancing MPs with 150 km outer ways is not what all
mappers do enjoy much.

> Renaming these tags cannot do any harm, because an ambiguous tag is
> replaced which an anambiguous and approved tag which perfectly
> matches the intended meaning.

For the proposal itself I don't have much objections.
IIRC I mapped some natural=rock on nodes which should have been
natural=stone but due to my German roots a stone is something I can
pick up from the ground – unlike a rock. :)

hth
Thomas

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to