2014-07-09 18:51 GMT+02:00 Daniel Koć <dan...@xn--ko-wla.pl>: > And then sometimes you end up with rendering problem because of lack of > enough distinction in the tagging (they are by your definition not what > they really should be), and what than? I would get back to tagging studio > and think if this visual distinction is not a symptom of a more fundamental > difference, which should be seen in tagging. And you? >
Yes, I also find a lot of such situations where there aren't yet tags for details I'd like to convey or even whole object classes missing. I "often" write proposals and hope that others catch them (e.g. amenity=monastery is one of these, where before many mappers insisted that tagging them as place_of_worship would suffice but now it seems that the tag gets used also by others). > > > Rendering instead tries to show what might be interesting for a given >> context (i.e. it will be a selection and generalization of all the >> information contained in the db). There is only one tagging/mapping >> db, but there are infinite rendering dbs. >> > > That's true for many "themed" maps, where the context is king, but I talk > only about default one. And there are also many wild tags out there (and I > don't touch them), but only one "default" set, and it is what I want to > talk about. This set is not too big, yet the default map doesn't show all > these default tags. I feel it's a bad quirk. > there was some pause with the main stylesheet until last year, but now there is great activity and a lot of things get touched (and amended). Be confident, the main style is improving rapidly and open to everyone to create pull requests. cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
