Daniel, I don't know about standardization of rendering, but I would say the advice on the wiki is followed by OSM mappers much more often than some veterans think.
2014-07-08 20:05 GMT-03:00 Daniel Koć <dan...@xn--ko-wla.pl>: > W dniu 08.07.2014 20:04, yvecai napisał(a): > > > However, if rendering is an interesting topic, wiki is full of >> rendering examples and advices that aren't followed anywhere. Let the >> > > You don't even realize how sad is this observation for me... > > What is the role of writing documentation than - and approving it or > declining? You can always use the tags as you like it, and they will be > rendered this way or another (or not a all), so why waste the time > proposing and documenting? > > > renderer render and the cartographer style the map, and trust them to >> understand tags of interest to them. >> > > You have no choice but to trust external rendering services - they will do > what they think is important anyway. And we show this trust by OSM license. > > But inside the project I think we need some more coherency. If there's an > approved proposal with rendering hints, at least the default render should > take it into account. Ideally I think all such features should be rendered > - and if not, the documentation should be revised by rendering team > explaining what is the problem. Eventually the consensus can be reached. > Otherwise, if OSM is basically the GIS database, why the main project page > has the map instead of big red "Download the data!" button? > > In my case it was as simple as taking the template and filling it up. > "Rendering" section in this template (and the field in the proposition > infobox) means it's not unusual that the tagging can have rendering > implications. And I see the difference in scale of peaks type, which should > be properly visualised to not make default map cluttered with unnecessary > details (like https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap- > carto/issues/689 ). But I just gave rough idea - the rendering team may > feel some other settings would be better. > > -- > Mambałaga > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
