Maybe we should move towards a scheme more specific about accepted currencies :
currency:in:USD=yes currency:out:BTC=yes For a one-way Bitcoin ATM dispensing BTC in exchange of USD, for example. On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe create a new tag that tells if the ATM is connected to the interbank > network[1] which makes an ATM a classical ATM. For example > interbank_network=yes, or interbank_network=ATH, or whichever interbank > network an ATM is connected to. Maybe there are some ATMs that only take > their own cards, which makes that ATM not very useful to the general public > just like the Bitcoin ATM. > > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interbank_network > > > 2014-06-09 14:30 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com>: > > 2014-06-09 13:58 GMT+02:00 Henning Scholland <o...@aighes.de>: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> I don't know if this would be a good idea. Of course it would be the >>> correct tagging, but on the other hand the typical interpretation of >>> amenity=atm is, that you get "real" money. As this fact is kind of >>> default, it is never tagged. AFAIK bitcoin-atm only handle bitcoins, so >>> it could lead to problems. >>> >>> Henning >>> >> >> AFAIK most Bitcoin ATMs right now take "real" money and convert it to >> Bitcoins. Some can take Bitcoins and convert them to real money and give it >> to you. So I'm not sure why this wouldn't be called an ATM. Calling it >> anything else would be tagging for the renderer (we don't want it to show >> up on maps because it isn't a classical ATM) >> >> We only have to insist on the tag cash_out=no, and then tell renderers to >> not render amenity=atm+cash_out=no. >> >> Janko >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
