In fact if I'm going to allow roads to appear twice in the relation then I can just build a continous route with no gaps and do away with the forward: and backward: bits altogether (just keeping 'grit' and 'travel' as my two roles).
Rob On 23 Mar 2014 22:07, "Rob Nickerson" <rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi All, I have some winter gritting/salting routes that I am trying to work out how best to tag them. I was thinking of creating a route relation, but I may need to add some new roles: * "forward:grit" implies the gritting truck grits this road whilst travelling in the direction of the way. * "forward:travel" implies the gritting truck drives along the direction of the way but does NOT grit it. Is this ok? I also have a concern that JOSM warns me if I try to add the same road way to the route twice. For gritting routes this is necessary - for example, grit Road A to roundabout, u-turn and travel back on Road A (but do not grit). In this example Road A would have to be added to the relation twice first as forward:grit and then as backward:travel. Is it okay if I ignore JOSMs error in this case? Regards, Rob
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
